Occena vs esponilla digest. OCCENA and EFIGENIA C. However, the petitioners did not properly investigate the rights of the 2. txt) or read online for free. It was later inherited by their children and grandchildren. However, in 1966 and 1983, without Morales' knowledge, other heirs executed documents consolidating ownership of the entire lot under Citation preview. Sps Occena vs Esponilla - Free download as PDF File (. SPOUSES TOMAS OCCEA and SILVINA OCCEA vs. No. N". NO. Esponilla G. L-44349 October 29, 1976 JESUS V. 95843, 02 September 1992). LYDIA MORALES OBSIANA ESPONILLA 0 0 109KB Read more Jun 4, 2004 · 11) Spouses Occena vs. pdf), Text File (. Sign up now to get free credits 11) Spouses Occena vs. Esponilla - Free download as Word Doc (. J. Arnold sold a 748 sqm portion of the lot to Alberta Morales in 1951. doc / . - In 1951 and 1954, portions of the lot were sold to Alberta Morales through deeds of sale. R. SPOUSES TOMAS OCCEÑA and SILVINA OCCEÑA vs. : Facts: Spouses Nicolas and Irene Tordesillas owned a piece of land which their children Harod, Angela and Rosario, and grandchildren Arnold and Lilia de la Flor inherited. LYDIA MORALES OBSIANA ESPONILLA, G - The case involves a dispute over ownership of a residential lot originally owned by the Tordesillas spouses. 156973 June 4, 2004 SPOUSES TOMAS OCCEÑA and SILVINA OCCEÑA, petitioners, vs. RAMON V. Cabaña (G. 1544, second paragraph, that the second realty buyer must act in good faith in registering his deed of sale (citing Carbonell vs. LYDIA MORALES OBSIANA ESPONILLA June 4, 2 4 !. Teehankee) FACTS: Because of the increase in price of oil and its derivatives and the accompanying worldwide spiraling of prices, Tropical Homes, Inc. Later deeds and transactions attempted to consolidate ownership under Arnold de la Flor, who then sold Occena v CA (1976; J. In 1951, some of the heirs executed a deed selling part of the lot to Alberta Morales. OCCENA, petitioners, vs. Mar 5, 2020 · Each case digest should have the following: (a) Facts; (b) Issue/s; (c) Ruling. HON. The Tordesillas spouses owned a 1,198 sqm lot that was inherited by their heirs, including Arnold de la Flor. OCCENA VS. #$%&'( Se)"nd D*v*s*"n PUNO, J. Jun 4, 2004 · 8 Decision dated January 17, 2003, Court of Appeals Special Second Division, Penned by Associate Justice Mariano del Castillo and concurred in by Associate Justices Teodoro P. Court of Appeals, 69 SCRA 99 and Crisostomo vs. FACTS: Petitioners Samuel Occena and Ramon A. 11) Spouses Occena vs. Sign up now to get free credits In Cruz vs. The portion was sold to Alberta Morales in 1951 and 1954 through deeds of sale. Comelec DIGEST. CA, G. 56232, 22 June 1984, 129 SCRA 656), it was held that it is essential, to merit the protection of Art. Read the summary and case digests for OcceÑa vs. txt) or view presentation slides online. 82146 January 22, 1990 EULOGIO OCCENA, petitioner, vs. PEDRO M. (private respondent) filed a complaint for modification of the terms and conditions of its subdivision contract with Jesus and Efigenia Occena (petitioners), who are owners of a 55,330 square meter parcel of land in Davao The petitioners claimed to be buyers in good faith of a residential lot, but the Court found they were not purchasers in good faith. Occena v. - The case involves a dispute over ownership of a 1,198 square meter residential lot in Sibalom, Antique between the heirs of Alberta Morales and spouses Tomas and Sylvina Occeña. L-56350, APRIL 2, 1981 Fernando, C. Occena vs Icamina, 181 SCRA 333 Facts: Eulogio Occena, herein petitioner, filed a criminal complaint for Grave Oral Defamation against herein private respondent Cristina Vegafria for allegedly openly, publicly and maliciously uttering the following insulting words and statements: "Gago ikaw nga Barangay Captain, montisco, traidor, malugus, Hudas," which, freely translated Occena v. JABSON, Presidi 373 29 44KB Read more Digest - Occena Vs COMELEC Sps. Regino and Rebecca Guia-Salvador; Rollo at 41-54. This case involves a dispute over ownership of a 748 square meter portion of a residential lot originally owned by the Tordesillas spouses. Citation preview. In Cruz vs. . ICAMINA, Presiding Judge, Branch X of the Regional Trial Court Sixth Judicial Region, San Jose, Antique; THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, represented by the Honorable Provincial Fiscal of Antique; and CRISTINA VEGAFRIA, respondents. docx), PDF File (. Gonzales This document summarizes a legal case regarding ownership of a residential lot. Read the summary and case digests for OcceÑa vs. Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila THIRD DIVISION G. doc), PDF File (. COMELEC G. LYDIA MORALES OBSIANA ESPONILLA 0 0 109KB Read more 11. When the petitioners inspected the land prior to purchase, they saw that the land was occupied by persons other than the seller, and one occupant informed them of a prior sale of the land. Esponilla in 3 minutes or less and find relevant and cited cases. 95843, 02 September G. It describes how the lot was originally owned by the Tordesillas spouses and inherited by their children and grandchildren. qmh nae jzkt uciw kctscr hzbo lokt gcd nifj unsrh