4k hdr remux vs encode vs bluray. barnaby jones Outstanding Member.

4k hdr remux vs encode vs bluray And I grab every WiLDCAT I can get my hands on. Godzilla vs Kong: 4K HDR Blu Ray remux 43,6 GB vs 4K HDR 10+ BluRay rip 5,39 GB? Question I have a Samsung QN90A Neo Qled 55 Inch and can only display HDR 10 and HDR 10+. The Included images are not sourced from the 4K UHD. Remux means the data has been copied (often simply to a new container like mkv) without any changes. High end productions are quite good on streaming, but bitrate of discs wins in this comparison. On average (and u/Mutelight will have better numbers on this) I believe that 1080p video from physical media is only slightly lower bitrate than 4k/HDR from your average streaming service. I think 10GB for a 2 hour movie in 4k is a good encode (so 20 for that 4 hour runtime). If you see a 2160p x265 encode movies that's only like 1GB, run away. Next time only download one. Another big thing I've noticed for encode vs remux is aspect ratios. Haha yes the questions came because of that. Reply reply [deleted] • Comment deleted by user. If you re-encode a Remux it won't be a Remux anymore, so, it being a Remux in the past, is irrelevant. As for the HDR part, both use HDR (as you said) so your theather set-up must be able to handle it. The only real benefit of the 4K HDR downloads is the HDR, but often the grading is poorly done as it was only for streaming purposes and not for a disk. Probably this Blu-ray comment from Kalroth 4y ago still applies BluRay is simply the media source. I'm just wondering why encodes are labeled 1080p but they are actually 800p. 5. the World was shot both digitally and on 35mm film using Arriflex 435 ES, Beaumont VistaVision, Panavision Panaflex Millennium XL2 and Phantom HD cameras, and ultimately finished as a 2K DI from which it appears this UHD is sourced. Picture wise, Dolby Vision/ HDR aren't beneficial enough to overcome the compressed image quality. S01. WiLDCAT also has made a few HDR fan restorations of individual films. 2019. Aug 6, 2018 #1 hi I have a 4K HDR tv. Yamil Llanos Movie. I would go for the REMUX, maybe delete some after, or buy extra storage. . BluRay. the World 4K Blu-ray Release Date July 6, 2021. Best 4k encodes vs remux for my setup Hey guys, so I'm setting up my plex server and I've been looking at torrents for 4k movies and I'm wondering what would be best, I dont have tons of storage and I'm seeing remuxes that are a lot of GB obviously then I'm seeing some encodes that are in the 20gb range but I've heard about 'tigole' being great which is quite low GB also. I personally would always prefer a 1080p blu-ray remux over a 4k Rip. These are all HDR color spaces that we’ve been grading inside of SDR environments for a very long Thanks for the reply. And if I'm looking at 2 files, one of them is a REMUX which is 140GB and the other is x265 less than 10GB. Thread starter james007; Start date Aug 6, 2018; Tags 4k blu ray uhd Points 28 Age 38 Location Canada. It mainly depends on the amount of motion and the amount of grain 4k remux vs x265 encode bitrate question . SpaceTime. Honestly I've rarely seen a difference in a 4k remux vs. Reply reply luminousfleshgiant • It depends a lot on what you have access to. Streaming might look better on newer digital content without much texture where compression is less visible Reply reply kmoros • If the movie has good HDR/DV, that puts it over the bluray imo. Definitely the REMUX, especially if you have a decent upscaler. I have an Alienware AW3423DW (3440x1440, OLED, HDR monitor). DTS How to best encode 4K blu-ray rips and keep HDR I've been recently buying a lot of 4k discs that I can rip no problem with my drive. 1080p is the resolution. those guys take forever and pay attention to the easy stuff like banding and artifacts looking for "transparent" encodes. I am trying to decide if I should buy the 4K HDR version of predator or the blu Ray remastered version. Scott Pilgrim vs. But apples to apples, it would then depend on how you watch the content. Unfotunately, my storage and bandwidth capacity doesn't allow for that. HDB has Scott Pilgrim vs. If it's 4k, MA / amazon VOD then 4k framestor / wildcat remux, no 4k encodes for me. Blu-ray reviews, news, specs, ratings, screenshots. If not, disc will usually win, but not by much. I have a 4K TV. a high quality encode. Joined Jul 20, 2011 Guide for Working with 4K HDR Blu-ray Rips in SDR. If you have a solid tv and a great sounbar, you could use the REMUX. Odyssey. There are more variables than that, such as encoding settings. I'm looking for the best quality settings to use for encoding via BLURANiUM (BLU) tends to produce a magnitude fewer remuxes, and tend to be long after (years) the movies have releases. Any time you re-encode a blu-ray, (which is what a Rip is) you will get some amount of compression artifacts and light banding. I notice compression more than resolution. Name. I've been ripping my blu-ray collection for a while now. Just watched District 9 1080p blu-ray on a 4k blu-ray player (Xbox One S) It was incredible. They're labelled with the tags in the title. 480p>720p>1080p>2160p(4k) Remux is an untouched BluRay. Watching tv from 2-2,5 m distance in my room. MA. I want to know if the difference between a remux file and a rip is that big or if I should go for the file with HDR 10+? Share Add a Comment. For more rare/old content I tend to grab BLURANiUM. Top. 264 vs. a complete 1to1 ripped from a BluRay that hasn't been reencoded. Based on your answer I understand that in Remux the letterboxes are native In this case, WEB-DL would be better. Which would you suggest I go for? Now from research, remuxes seem to be the best option, as they're How to encode a 4K HDR movie using ffmpeg while maintaining selected auio tracks intact from source. A 1080p Blu-ray will have 2x+ the bitrate on average but it is also using an older an less efficient codec, it being H. How different is the x265? And is it Dune (2021) 4k Blu-ray still (slightly more definition and separation of Duncan) Dune on 4k Blu-ray has been encoded with the Dolby Vision spec, making the color rendering so much more than what Remux DTS HD vs Blu Ray True HD . Question Hello guys, I just bought my first 4K TV (LG OLED65C9) and I want to start getting some 4K movies. What’s better?? Reply. 265 by modern streaming services so not an apples to apple HDR has more color depth than SDR, but you need a special monitor/tv to display it, otherwise you need special software to transform the HDR into SDR or it will look really bad. 2014. A. I mean that if I play a Remux, PotPlayer indicates the resolution as 1920x1080p and if I play an encode, the resolution is 1920x800p though they both have the black bars at the top. 1-FGT Interstellar. HDR footage is nothing new. Depends on the bluray. x265. Open comment sort options. Hence i have settled for bitrates of ~5-10 mbps. UHD. HEVC. It would also have the same video properties of resolution, bitrate, and HDR/DV as well as the lossless audio track and subtitles. 1 You can have a remux of an old 480p DVD or a new UHD Blu-ray. Don't do 4K yet. x265-RARBG. When you say pixels I'm assuming you mean compression artifacts or banding? A blu-ray remux will always be higher quality than anything re-encoded. Cheap Blu-ray movies and deals. So a BluRay release If you do your own high-quality encodings, I have found that you can shrink both 1080p BluRay and 4K BluRay down to about half their Remux size (on average) without any visual quality loss. 1-NOGRP[rartv] Cosmos. An encoder wrote this in their nfo for a 1080p encode for a recent movie, comparing the blu ray with a 4k WEB-DL: The film has a lot of dark scenes, 4k web source has better PQ, especially in dark and flat areas, and less bandings and blockings, and also there are more details in 4k web source, and bd is vague in many details and scenes, so I chose and encode from web source. Remux means uncompressed released, if it doesn't have the Remux tag the release has been compressed. HDR. barnaby jones Outstanding Member. I say on average, but some will only shrink by about 25% and others shrink more than 50%. this is just my personal opinions. H. Whereas, encodes have minimal buffering. 23 votes, 15 comments. REMUX. New. DTS-HD. Will I see any difference in quality between the remux and the encode? Interstellar. Think of Arri Log C, RED RWG/Log3G10, Sony S-log, or Panasonic V-log. The only difference would be if author left out audio tracks and subtitles from the remux. HDR and Remux are two different things that have nothing to do with each other. And since the space tradeoff is often between ~~55GN I used to encode my Blurays with Megui and Handbrake back in the day so I do have experience with encoding. So a BluRay release without the 'remux' tag I have a pretty good eye for detail, but I can't see a constantly noticeable difference between remux 4K and properly encoded 4K. 1080p. I have "40 LED Full HD tv. We’ve been using it for well over a decade in SDR workflows, despite HDR delivery being relatively new. HDR means High Dynamic Range of colour/brightness, and for UHD releases (Remux or not) if it doesn't have a HDR or SDR that 99% of the times it is a HDR release. To me, for blockbusters I want to watch ASAP I grab FraMeSToR. However, once they're ripped, I'd like to render in h265 (or something equivalent) while also retaining HDR and overall good picture quality while saving on at least some storage space. The disc presents an upscaled to 3840 x 2160p LG OLED CX here. There are a lot of knobs that can be turned when turning a Remux into a x265 encode. Best. Question I'm currently trying to get my hands on Apocalypse Now through rar bg, and the the top two files by size are a remux and what looks to be a remux but isn't labelled as such. At least with my video setup. Two remuxes of the same disc would have the same quality since it is a lossless rip. 2160p. But their remux standards are the highest. It's mostly "regular" blu-rays but some of them are 4k/HDR copies as well. i could be wrong , what is your thought ? Hier sollte eine Beschreibung angezeigt werden, diese Seite lässt dies jedoch nicht zu. I really want to be able to watch movies on this thing and not lose out on much quality at 4K UHD vs BLU RAY REMUX. For example remux 4k weights like 60 gb and has around 60 mbit bitrate, I found good encodes x265 4k dv+hdr10 with 32 mbit Debating between 4K Remux vs Encode as I'm in between upgrading some of my encode to remuxes and wondering if I should upgrade my entire collection or just some How do y'all There's no such thing as a "x264 1080p Blu-ray Remux", regardless of what the file name says. AVC. Good encodes crop the video to remove the black bars which means they can properly be viewed using plex, etc. Rating : 6. The biggest difference would be seen between webdl and the remux as the webdl almost certainly doesn't have enough bitrate. I did comparing tests with Remux, HDB internals, scene encodes and 5,6,7 GB 1080p HEVC encodes and all looks the same regarding to video quallity. But the example you gave is a high quality x265 and the file size shows that. Good encodes (DON, SbR, etc) you will not notice the difference between the remux and the encode. 10bit. A WEB-DL will always stay a WEB-DL, even if re-encoded, as WEB-DL (strictly) means it's been losslessly downloades from the source, it has nothing to do with the quality of the end file. Genres : Action, Sci-Fi When the universe's greatest villain returns in a terrifying new form, old adversaries, the Reds and Blues of Blood Gulch, will have to set aside their differences to save the galaxy one las I didn't ask which release type would offer the highest quality overall, since a BluRay REMUX or large BluRay-Rip will obviously be superior in quality to any WEBDL. If it has a good encode the disc will absolutely be better. Most remuxes i've watched keep these black bars and therfore the screen isnt being x265 is an encoded 4K BluRay. on the other hand, the smaller 265/264 files appear to be smoothing Definitely the 4K version, the Blu-ray release from 2010 should be avoided at all costs and the 2008 release is OOP and quite dated but still the better of the two Blu-ray BluRay is simply the media source. So it has lost quality, if you want to go for the best use the REMUX version. Download encode and remux and find out if you can tell the difference. Top 2 are made from the bottom one, what you think? Unless the source has some problems like dirty pixels and banding, and the encoder fixes them, the remux is always best. 3/10 based on 116 user ratings. There is absolutely no difference between proper size encodes. The audio, alone, ended the contest. Cosmos. I've heard REMUX is the most original source quality you can get. Sort by: Best. A "Blu-ray Remux" traditionally refereed to someone ripping a Blu-Ray, stripping The remuxes have extreme noise that’s really distracting and actually discards some of the depth information of the scene. for me plex streaming for 4K remuxes is so inconsistent even on direct play. Also because the 4k movies I usually obtain are 60 - 100 gb uhd remuxes and not 4k web-dls and I usually find web-dl to be lower in quality than Blu ray even with a higher Bitrate. ieknk ykukk qmj gnj bdzcsgy lmnb wywyse skzrf eqmul ark